Leah McLaren Strikes Back!
The Globe columnist-turned-novelist defamed the so-called blogosphere on the weekend in her Saturday allotment. She intimated that bloggers are bitter, bad writers without editors to clean them up or publishers to keep them locked up. Funny, because I often wonder about her editors…Actually, she has a point. For the most part, blogging is done to hear the sound of one’s own keyboard clicking away, seemingly indicating productivity. (I realise the terrible irony of what I have just written, but let’s just skip that step for the moment.)
I wonder if she was pissed because she found so many people don’t really like her, or at least her writing (and probably aren’t smart enough to distinguish between the two). Hey, I can sympathize with these people—the first blog I did was an effort to chronicle just how bad McLaren’s Saturday columns were. Yes, very immature, I know. To be fair to the bloggers/ haters, though, writing does often betray a good chuck of the writer’s actual personality. The problem with Leah McLaren is not that she is annoying—or, I guess to be more accurate, and somewhat charitable, the writing persona she has created for a very specific demographic (single, hipster, Toronto girls who take themselves way too seriously) is annoying—the problem is that she didn’t write very well either.
But these things take time. Her article on Special K Pilates balls was actually kind of funny—mostly because it was true, but also because it seemed like McLaren finally got that it was funny. She lost a bit of her obliviousness, or perhaps gained a little bit of tongue-in-cheek (maybe she finally got some).
A couple weekends ago, I was very surprised to read her column and find it tightly written, funny, and almost self-aware. I only noticed after I had read it that it was an excerpt from her novel. That explained the solid editing, but it also provided a reason for her recent transformation: in writing this novel about a woman in her 30s searching for man to have a baby with, she must have realised the folly of her situation, and a little bit the impetus behind why these women act this way.
Why are so many young, professional women obsessed with their image and social status (not to say that there aren’t as many men who are, but for the moment, let’s focus on the ladies)? It is a deep, instinctual drive to find a mate. That, friends, is the driving force behind why we do anything, really. So it is important for Leah McLaren (and her audience) to have the right pumps, and a mini-cooper, and a farm because all of these things put them in the category of “successful woman” that has been created, rightly or wrongly, by our society (blame it on the media, whatever, it is all built by humans and we all have the same drives). And what else does a “successful woman” have? Babies of course. So all these things make them attractive to guys. Guys, of course, well, we play our own games, but to the same effect. Bigger, stronger, flashier. Treat ‘em mean, keep ‘em keen. Whatever works.
Leah McLaren, I believe, in writing her novel, as achieved self-awareness. I can’t say whether or not that will help her writing. There seems to be a bit of an edge to it that was lacking before the novel. Maybe it is the confidence of having the novel come out that has got her going. I can’t get inside her head. It’s just what I see from over here.
In any case, the reason, now, that Leah McLaren has chosen to rise above the bloggers may be that she has that self-awareness they don’t have. I’m trying to make this blog as self-aware as possible. It’s a hard thing to do because there are always forces driving us the power of which we don’t understand. But knowing that is at least a step in the right direction.
Still, there is an irony to her aloofness—and I’m not the one she cares about, I’m certain of that. Only recently was she engaged in a massive bitch-fest with another writer, Ryan Bigge. The deal is that a few years ago, McLaren panned Bigge’s book. This month, Bigge panned her book. Boohoo: if you can’t take the heat, get out of the way of all the authors talking. Maybe her recent column is another slag at Bigge, or a shot at all the bloggers who agree with him. Maybe she isn’t so self-aware after all, just cranking up the bitch-mill. At least now she’s somewhat entertaining to read, kind of like watching a hockey fight—you enjoy it with guilty pleasure—whereas before it was like passing a jack-knifed tractor-trailer on the 401—you're disgusted, but you can't look away.

2 Comments:
You must must read How Happy to Be by Katrina Onstad who writes from within very the same milieu but writes very well, and there’s even a certain vapid character based on... guess who?
hey there. so i guess having had several years of experience with blogging, taking linguistics classes and thinking about issues of communication in general, i've formed this opinion (that i posted as a reply to a friend's journal where she was talking about deleting entries) [comments made in brackets are added to clarify]:
"i understand wanting to delete posts. i mean, i've done it myself a few times. but i always find it's almost taking the easy way out and not really taking responsibility for the things i've said. i mean, obviously when i say something there's a reason behind it. but it's also tough cause sometimes the things we say can be hurtful to other people and it might seem like deleting a post would take the things we've said back... but it doesn't really. it's been read and the words we've used have had an effect. and i guess we just have to learn to explain why we chose those words at the time we did and recognize the fact that with lj [or blogging in general], things that were written in a passionate moment can be read later on and we have to be willing to defend those things. there have been a couple times when jeff [my boyfriend] randomly decided to read my lj [livejournal] and he was hurt, but once we actually discuss what i wrote and the reasons behind it we can get past it.
sometimes i find myself wanting to write another post to amend something i said in a previous post, or explain it further... and that helps. but sometimes i come to those conclusions and just don't feel like bothering to type it up. which is another tricky thing about lj. i mean, if i went back to my old posts, there are SO many of them i would delete because they're not representative of how i think now. but they're still representative of me and the journey i've taken to become who i am. and i'm willing to accept that.
this is also something i've discussed with my brother, since he recently got a blog himself. although he uses his less for personal things, but more for general observations about sports and writing and politics and stuff. and a conclusion that i think he's starting to come to [maybe i'm wrong, but this is what i got from this particular entry] is that when you write anything about your opinions about anything, it's going to reflect the way you perceive the world through your own personal network of associations that has been building in your brain since you were born. and that will never be the same as anybody else. and i think we need to be proud of that, but we also need to be willing to let our networks of association keep growing and changing. and that happens everyday, whenever we talk to anyone else, whenever we read another book, whenever we see another movie, whenever we absorbe new information of any kind. and that includes when we write something.
so that's my little rant about communication. some of that definitely came from my linguistics classes..."
just another comment to add to all that. the reason i sometimes post things and don't discuss them with jeff is because at the time i'm posting them i haven't quite understood the things i'm feeling. writing it out helps me see what my thought patterns are and where i'm coming from and where i'm going to. and that allows me to reevaluate if the things i'm feeling make sense or if i've missed a step somewhere. but of course, without discussing the problems with the other person, there's always the possibility that i just don't see things the way they do. eventually i do talk to him about these things, but only once i've worked out that i haven't missed something in my own thought process, as opposed to missing something in theirs. and whenever someone reads my blog, i explain to them that the entries aren't my final thoughts on a subject and i'm open to people discussing it with me and commenting (in fact i encourage it because it often helps me figure things out), as long as they recognize that i'm not deliberately trying to hurt anyone with anything i've said, i'm just working out my thoughts and feelings.
so anyway... i think that's basically where i stand on the whole blogging thing.
whatcha gotta say bout that? huh?
Post a Comment
<< Home