Monday, January 23, 2006

The right to bear flags (or flag bears?)

Don Cherry is in trouble again, this time for being too patriotic. No, it’s not last-minute electioneering. Grapes reacted to certain Canadian winter Olympians asking to have their names taken from the list of potential flag bearers so they could focus on their events and avoid distraction. In his typical loud-mouthed fashion, he claimed those athletes don’t care about Canada, and pointed out that “in the U.S. they don’t have that problem.”

Speed skater Catorina Le May Doan expressed her disdain for Cherry, saying he doesn’t understand what it takes to be an Olympic athlete. Nancy Greene, a former Olympic skier, also chimed in, saying it is harder to win an Olympic gold medal than it is to be the NHL scoring leader.

While I appreciate the athlete’s need for focus, I think it is a bit harsh of everyone to attack Don Cherry’s enthusiastic patriotism. He means well, I think.

Amateur athletes often feel neglected because we are under-funded. I paid my way to New Zealand to represent Canada. I got $100 from my MNA, but that’s it in terms of the “public” support that we are supposed to be so thankful for. To be fair, I am far from being an Olympian, and I would gladly pay my own way again. I appreciate public support for elite amateur sport, I think it has a positive effect on the health of the nation, but I don’t feel entitled to it.

The support-related adversity we face is in some respects a motivating factor, but really, it comes down to being willing to sacrifice your life for the sport. That sacrifice is what separates the winners from the losers, not money. Money provides opportunity, but the best athletes will seize whatever opportunity they have and make the most of it.

In terms of an Olympic gold medal being harder than winning an NHL scoring title, as much as I respect the efforts of all the amateur athletes out there, I believe being the best professional hockey player in the world is just as tough being the best luge slider—maybe harder, but it is tough to judge. There is one scoring leader a year in the NHL, four each Olympiad. There are many more gold medals than that to win. Just because the NHLers are professionals doesn’t mean that they have an easier ride than under-funded amateurs. As AC/DC like to say: “It’s a long way to the top if you want to rock and roll.”

Millions of Canadians (never mind Americans and Europeans) dream of making it to the NHL (never mind winning the scoring race). Not too many dream of bobsled gold. Heather Moyse, the new brake-woman on Canada’s World Cup-winning team, has not worked all her life for this chance to win Olympic gold. She was recruited last summer at a retirement party for her university track coach. I was there. Before that she had never done bobsled. She has played soccer and rugby and run track. She is an immensely talented natural athlete, and a wonderful person. I hope she wins.

—as an aside, it is very interesting to read the comments of Canada’s driver, Helen Upperton, regarding the team’s recent success:

“I got to the bottom after the first run and I was actually kind of frustrated,” she said. “I’d had a couple of little hits on the way down and skidded a bit out of the first corner.

“Then I looked up at the clock and I was amazed. It was a new situation for me and I was so nervous going into that second run. The one thing that’s good is I know I can always count on a rocket-fast start.”

Yeah, because Heather is pushing. Does it say something about the sport that someone so inexperienced can have such an impact as to make her driver one of the best in the world?

Anyway, I hope they win. I think they will. Just sayin’, that’s all—

There is no doubt, though, that Ilya Kovalchuk (or Simon Gagné or whoever) will have put in just as much, likely much more work over their lives than Heather has to win her potential gold medal. It is hard to compare across sports, and probably it is best to say that all are equally tough, but to imply that professionals don’t work as hard as amateurs is just plain wrong.

In terms of carrying the flag, I guess Charmaine Crooks is right: every athlete is different. Don Cherry would jump at the chance. Becky Scott would not. I know that if I were competing in the Olympic Marathon (big if!), and it were the day after the opening ceremonies, I would have a tough decision to make. That said, Cherry made the very good point that Alex Bauman carried the flag in 1984 and won gold the next day. In 1988 Carolyn Waldo also won gold. In 2000 Carolyn Brunet won silver. At the winter Olympics, since 1984, Gaetan Boucher, Brian Orser, Sylvie Daigle, and Catorina Le May Doan (!) have all won medals after carrying the flag for Canada.

I think, ironically, some of those athletes who have asked to have their names removed are just looking for publicity. Either that, or they aren’t too confident in their abilities. I think the opening ceremonies are likely the most exciting part of the Games for many athletes. Olympians I have known have all said that those opening ceremonies are the best part of the whole experience. It is really all about the experience. There will always be some regret (world records and gold medals are rare, and even then, knowing elite athletes, there would still be a bit of “woulda coulda shoulda”), and I would rather regret .1 seconds than regret the cultural experience. World records can be broken, gold medal titles change hands, but the experience can never be taken away.

My pick for flag bearer would be Lascelles Brown, the newest Canadian citizen on the team. Or Heather Moyse because after less than a year in the sport she is going to single-handedly (or two-leggedly) bring Canada a gold medal in the women’s bobsled. Either way, I can’t wait to waste a lot of February mornings watching the Olympics on tv. Woohoo! ‘Lympics! 'Lympics!

6 Comments:

At 11:50 a.m., Blogger Amateur said...

Brunet (2000 flag bearer) went to the Olympics five times (so far). She has only been to the opening twice -- her rookie Olympics, and 2000. This happens all the time. It's just that this time Don Cherry found out about it.

At any rate, I disagree strongly that it is "all about the experience," although that is certainly something you have to consider. Here are some more thoughts.

 
At 11:59 a.m., Blogger JTL in MTL said...

Amateur,

I guess "all about the experience" for me encompasses the opening ceremonies, the village, and the results. It would be a shame to miss one of them for the sake of the other--so, it would be a shame to have a bad race because you were drained from the opening ceremony, or tired from staying up all night with that cute Swedish high jumper. But it would also be a shame not to carry the flag if asked, then bomb in your event, which is entirely possible, regardless of what happens at the opening ceremonies. If Brunet has gone five times, then I can see how the experience part is less of an issue than the results.

Still, my point is just that Cherry gets dumped on all the time, but he is really just enthusiastic. And the knee-jerk comments of some amateur athletes regarding pros are just as uninformed.

I like your blog, and will read more. What is your event?

 
At 11:42 p.m., Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think in general your analysis is correct, the cermonies are a symbolic gathering of nations that should be cherished by all, but personally I would tend to side with the athletes in this case - the chance may never come again to compete at this level.

Besides, if in skipping the ceremonies allows you to prepare properly for those crucial few seconds or minutes of competition you might just earn the privilage of carrying the flag in the closing ceremonies - and with a bright shiny medal to show off too.

Also, I think your comparison to hockey was a poor choice. It is easier for people to excel at a sport such as hockey when they can't build facilities fast enough to meet the demand, have a strong sports organization, and unending public & corporate support behind them. Compare that to other sports where facilities are built or renovated once a generation at best and nobody cares about the athletes except for those 2 weeks every 4 years.

Finally, you conveniently left out the 40% of flag bearers who were less than successful in their events (if you define success as a medal):

1998 Nagano: Jean Luc Brassard, freestyle skiing (failed to medal)
1994 Lillehammer: Kurt Browning, figure skating (failed to medal)
1980 Lake Placid: Ken Read, skiing (failed to medal)
1976 Innsbruck: Dave Irwin, skiing (failed to medal)

Maybe WADA can get involved and make everyone march in to the stadium to ensure a level playing field. After all, isn't a competitor resting back in the village watching TV images of their opponents on a forced march in the heat/cold an unfair advatange?

 
At 2:07 p.m., Blogger JTL in MTL said...

Re: the hockey comparison, it wasn't me, it was Nancy Greene who brought it up. I was just commenting on it. You are right about opportunity though, with respect to hockey. What I mean is just that athletes in all sports work equally hard, I'm sure, whether they are making millions or paying their own way. If they weren't working hard, they wouldn't bother paying their own way, and/or they wouldn't be making the big bucks.

I didn't conveniently leave anyone out, I was just making the point that carrying the flag is no guarentee of messing up your event. Fortunately, there is no guarenteed way of winning it, either, which is why we play the games.

 
At 11:38 p.m., Blogger Amateur said...

Hi John,

I was a kayaker (flatwater).

You are right that the Olympics encompasses a whole range of experiences and it would be nice if everybody could enjoy all of them. But the primary purpose is to compete at your best (in my opinion). I went to the opening ceremonies, but some of my teammates didn't. I (we) did not stay in the Olympic village because we were competing 90 km away and we wanted better control over our transportation.

As for Cherry, I don't think his position is very defensible. For one thing, I am pretty sure that the NHL players are not going to the opening ceremonies in Turin, and therefore none of their names have been put forward for flagbearer. So why isn't Cherry criticizing them? In his mind, the fact that they have NHL games to play is a valid excuse, whereas the athletic preparation of a (mere) speedskater is nothing. A bit hypocritical, don't you think?

 
At 8:10 a.m., Blogger JTL in MTL said...

Amateur,

Cherry isn't the one who brought up hockey, but it would be fair to say that he has been hypocritical on occasion.

Charmaine Crooks had the best response: it depends on the athlete. Some can handle the extra load of the ceremonies, some would prefer not to. Don Cherry's job is to be hyper-nationalist and create controversy. So he's done it. It might be nice if he created a controversy over amateur sport half-way through the four years, instead of just before the Games, to get these sports some attention.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home